Inventory counts, order timestamps, and carrier scans were consolidated into a single, tidy table with consistent keys. The team documented current definitions, then calculated OTIF, cycle time distributions, and forecast error using simple, repeatable queries. They annotated anomalies like holiday spikes and system outages, preventing misguided conclusions. A visual timeline showed queues forming every Monday, pointing to receiving constraints. By week’s end, everyone agreed on the numbers and a shortlist of fixes with clear owners and dates.
Scheduled connectors replaced manual exports, and webhooks captured shipment milestones in near real time. A reference table standardized product and location codes, erasing months of lookup confusion. Alerts highlighted late supplier confirmations and orders missing promised ship dates. The dashboard gained concise cards for headline indicators, trend charts with annotations, and drill-downs by lane, customer, and SKU. With plumbing handled, the team could redirect energy from gathering data to testing changes, validating impacts, and deciding the next iteration.
They launched a daily standup around the exception list. Buyers expedited only the orders that risked key customer SLAs, guided by a clear prioritization rule. Warehouse leads addressed the specific waves with pick accuracy dips. Carrier managers renegotiated lanes with chronic dwell time. Each action generated a note linked to the affected records. Within days, rush shipments fell, and service stabilized. Most importantly, the habit stuck, because people saw their actions reflected in improving numbers they understood and trusted.